Context and Problem
Applications need to ensure that their components are healthy and available, detecting failures proactively.
- Lack of visibility into application health.
- Difficulty detecting partial failures within a distributed system.
- Inability to route traffic away from unhealthy instances.
- Challenges in automating service recovery.
Solution
The Health Endpoint Monitoring pattern provides dedicated health check endpoints that external systems can query to determine application status.
- Implement a `/health` endpoint that reports application status.
- Include checks for database connectivity, external dependencies, and internal processes.
- Integrate health checks with load balancers and orchestrators.
- Log and alert on health check failures.
- Use different levels of health checks (liveness, readiness, and startup probes).
Benefits
- Proactive failure detection
- Identifies service failures before they impact users.
- Automated recovery
- Enables load balancers and orchestrators to handle failures.
- Improved observability
- Provides insight into the health of system components.
- Enhanced resiliency
- Helps ensure high availability of services.
Trade-offs
- Increased overhead
- Frequent health checks consume system resources.
- False positives/negatives
- Improperly configured checks may misreport status.
- Security risks
- Exposing health endpoints publicly can provide attackers with system insights.
Issues and Considerations
- Dependency failures
- A failing dependency may not always indicate an application failure.
- Monitoring granularity
- Defining the right level of checks for different scenarios.
- Scalability
- Managing health checks in large-scale distributed systems.
When to Use This Pattern
- When monitoring application health for automated recovery.
- When integrating with load balancers to avoid routing traffic to unhealthy instances.
- When improving visibility into service dependencies.